In the November 4, 2014 election Sales Tax Referendum you
are NOT voting directly on the
GreenLight Plan.
For your convenience here is the entire Sales Tax Ordinance
13- 34 with comments from all 12 of my previous Posts.
This is the language you will see on the Ballot:
Levy
of Countywide One Percent Sales Surtax to Fund Greenlight Pinellas Plan
for Public Transit.
Summary: Shall
the improvement, construction, operation, maintenance and financing of public
transit benefiting Pinellas County, including an expanded bus system with bus
rapid transit, increased frequency and extended hours, local passenger rail and
regional connections be funded by levying a one percent sales surtax from
January 1, 2016 until repealed, with the proceeds deposited in a dedicated
trust fund?
___ YES, for the
1% sales surtax
___ NO, against the
1% sales surtax
Read that title very carefully. You are voting to make
Ordinance 13- 34 a law. This is an important distinction, because Ordinance 13-
34 will become a law if the referendum succeeds, but the GreenLight Plan does
not.
Here is a link to the actual Ordinance (Law) that you are
being asked to approve in the sales Tax Referendum: Greenlight
Pinellas Tax Ordinance.
ORDINANCE
NO. 13- 34
AN ORDINANCE OF
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PINELLAS COUNTY LEVYING THE CHARTER COUNTY
AND EGIONALTRANSPORTATION SYSTEM SURTAX SUBJECT TO ELECTOR APPROVALAT A RATE OF
ONE PERCENT; ESTABLISHING THE EFFECTIVE DATE OFTHE SURTAX; PROVIDING FOR
ADMINISTRATION, COLLECTION, ANDENFORCEMENT OF THE SURTAX; PROVIDING FOR THE
DISTRIBUTION, USE, AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF SURTAX PROCEEDS; CALLING FOR
A REFERENDUM ELECTION FOR APPROVAL OF
IMPOSITION OF THE SURTAX; PROVIDING
A BALLOT TITLE AND SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED REFERENDUM QUESTION; PROVIDING
FOR NOTICE OF THE REFERENDUM ELECTION; PROVIDING FOR NOTICE TO BE GIVEN TO THE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE PINELLAS COUNTY
CODE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
The paragraph presented above in its format from
Ordinance No 13- 34 is called the Preamble and appears at the top of the
Ordinance document. The Preamble describes in legally acceptable terms what is
in the Ordinance that follows.
Here is a Breakdown:
AN ORDINANCE OF
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PINELLAS COUNTY LEVYING THE CHARTER COUNTY
AND REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM SURTAX SUBJECT TO ELECTOR APPROVAL AT A RATE OF
ONE PERCENT;
This Section establishes the Board of County
Commissioners legal authority to levy the sales tax increase.
ESTABLISHING THE
EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE SURTAX;
This section establishes the County Board of
Commissioners ability to set the effective date of the tax.
PROVIDING FOR
ADMINISTRATION, COLLECTION, AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE SURTAX;
This section establishes the legal grounds for the
administration and collection of the sales tax.
PROVIDING FOR
THE DISTRIBUTION, USE, AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF SURTAX PROCEEDS;
This Section sets up the overall responsibility for
management of the proceeds of the sales tax.
CALLING FOR
A REFERENDUM ELECTION FOR APPROVAL OF IMPOSITION OF THE SURTAX;
This section sets up the referendum mechanism and calls
for a public vote.
PROVIDING A
BALLOT TITLE AND SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED REFERENDUM QUESTION;
This Section provides for the actual Ballot language you
will see on your mail in or voting booth ballot.
PROVIDING FOR
NOTICE OF THE REFERENDUM ELECTION;
This Section provides for public notice of the
Referendum vote.
PROVIDING FOR
NOTICE TO BE GIVEN TO THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE;
This Section provides for a legal notice to be sent to
the Florida department of Revenue should the Referendum pass indicating the
County will begin collecting the tax
PROVIDING FOR
INCLUSION IN THE PINELLAS COUNTY CODE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;
This Section does two important things. First should
the Referendum succeed, it incorporates the language of the Referendum
Ordinance No. 13- 34 into the County Code as Law and provides Severability
which means if any Section of Ordinance No. 13- 34 is found to be illegal; the
finding does affect any other Section of the Sales Tax Ordinance.
PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Section provides for the setting of an effective
date for the implementation of the Sale Tax increase should the Referendum
pass.
The Preamble contains a legally acceptable summary
phrasing of the Sections that follow in the actual Ordinance that will become
law.
The WHEREAS
Section:
WHEREAS, Sections
212.054 and 212.055(1), Florida Statutes (the "Acts"),
authorize certain counties in Florida, including charter counties, to levy
a discretionary sales surtax referred to as the "Charter County and
Regional Transportation System Surtax" ("Surtax") subject
to elector approval; and
This Section identifies
the State Statute that provides for charter counties to levy sales surtaxes.
WHEREAS, the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners ("Board")
previously declared its intent in Resolution No. 13-19 to place a
referendum question on the November 4, 2014 ballot seeking approval of a
levy of up to one percent Surtax to fund countywide transportation
projects; and
Note in this WHEREAS the law as provided for by
State Statute and established by this Ordinance is constructed to allow a sales
sir tax UP TO 1% but in fact the County proposes to levy the entire 1%
from day one.
There is no PSTA budget or plan that requires this fourfold increase in PSTA revenue for the very first year of the sales sir tax.
WHEREAS, the
Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority ("PST A"), a
transportation authority created by a special act to purchase, own and/or
operate transit facilities within Pinellas County, has developed a plan
for the improvement, construction, equipping, operation, maintenance and
financing of public transit benefitting Pinellas County, including an
expanded bus system with bus rapid transit, increased frequency and
extended hours, and local passenger rail and regional connections,
commonly referred to as the "Greenlight Pinellas Plan;" and
Here the term Greenlight
Pinellas Plan first appears. It is broadly defined by the terms that proceed it
in the WHEREAS; and then the WHEREAS further reduces the GreenLight
plans' authority by using the phrase "commonly referred to as the
Greenlight Pinellas Plan."
There is no definition
of the GreenLight Plan, no detail for the Greenlight plan and no specific
funding allocation for the bus portion of the GreenLight Plan.
The GreenLight Plan is
more of a marketing phrase than a referendum requirement. There is nothing here
that ties the County or PSTA to the Greenlight plan, requires any of the sales
tax proceeds to actually be spent on the plan. In fact in the next WHEREAS it becomes clear that the real intent is to fund a bonding
effort.
WHEREAS, the
revenues generated by the Surtax are needed to fund the costs of
public transit and the repayment of any bonds or other obligations or
indebtedness which may be incurred for those purposes; and
The real
purpose of this sales tax and why it is applied at the full 1% may just begin
to unfold here as this WHEREAS
begins to lead the revenue generated by Ordinance into the repayment of Bonds
or other undefined indebtedness.
The question is
with the PSTA property tax revenue at about $40 million and an expected $100 to
$130 million in annual sales tax revenue, if the Bus expansion is really the
plan, could that not be handled from the additional sales tax revenues without
any bonding or borrowing requirements?
There may be
many reasons for moving to a bond issue but one of the principal reasons is to
tie up as much of the sales tax revenue as possible in a pledge to pay the bond
obligation. This one single move could legally lock Pinellas County into the 1%
sales sir tax for the life of the bonds, 20 or 30 years. A large portion of the
sales tax proceeds going to interest, not to public transportation.
The control of
how the bond proceeds would be spent could and probably would be specified in
the bond covenants and the money becomes totally out of the control of the
County Commission.
The primary
objective of the bonding effort would likely be to assure that the rail
proposal of the GreenLight plan gets funded eliminating any future public
efforts to stop the rail plan and assuring funds for everything from rail
planning to construction.
WHEREAS, it
is the intent of the Board to levy the Surtax at a rate of one percent (1
%) pursuant to the provisions contained in the Acts as provided herein;
and
This Section
establishes that the Sales Surtax will be applied at the full 1% ($130 million)
rather that gradually applied as State law allows and as the PSTA budget needs
actually require additional funding to expand bus service.
This Ordinance
was drafted by the PSTA Legal department and approved with almost no change by
the Pinellas County Commission.
Applying a
reasonable person test to just this much of the Ordinance should cause you to
strongly consider voting NO.
WHEREAS, the
Board finds that the transportation improvements will enhance access
to major employment centers in Pinellas County, increasing the County's
economic competitiveness, promote walkable communities, enhance mixed-use
neighborhoods, promote economic and community redevelopment, protect
stable neighborhoods, expand mobility choices for the citizens and
visitors of County, promote environmental stewardship, create jobs for
the citizens of the County, address traffic congestion which will promote
a more efficient countywide transportation system, including without
limitation, indirectly promoting more efficient delivery of public safety
services, and provide greater community and regional connectivity; and
This Whereas
sets the general reasons for proceeding with the Ordinance. It is by design
general in approach tries to rope in as many feel good points as possible other
than leading to the next Whereas.
WHEREAS, the
transportation improvements therefore will further various
important public purposes; and
This Whereas,
however, accepts the two above it as fact, lumping the previous Whereas in to
the general term "transportation improvements" which becomes the supporting
subject of the final Whereas.
WHEREAS, the
levy of the Surtax therefore is in the best interests of Pinellas
County and its citizens and is necessary to sufficiently fund needed
transportation improvements benefitting the County.
In this
Whereas, the circular logic of pervious three Whereas clauses are now assumed
to be in your best interest and a totally valid reason for you to accept the
necessity to fund an undetermined plan and one or more to be determined
interlocal agreements, and obligation bonds to build an undefined
transportation system for which you will pay $130 Million per year for a to be
determined period of time.
Section I. Incorporation of
Recitals. The above findings and recitals are hereby incorporated herein
and made a part of this Ordinance.
This Section
insures that all of the Comments in the Whereas Section and Preamble are
included as part of the Ordinance that will become law if approved.
Section 2. Surtax. Imposition
and Levy of the Charter County and Regional Transportation System
(a) There is levied and imposed by Pinellas
County ("County"), the Charter County and Regional
Transportation System Surtax authorized by Section 212.055(1), Florida
Statutes, throughout the incorporated and unincorporated areas of Pinellas
County, at the rate of one percent (1%) on transactions taxable
pursuant to Section 212.054, Florida Statutes, subject to the approval of
a majority of the electors of Pinellas County voting in a referendum election
called for the purpose of determining whether such Surtax should be
levied. (b) The levy of the Surtax, if approved by a majority of the
electors as required by paragraph 2(a) shall be limited to the purposes
set forth in this Ordinance and shall take effect January 1, 2016, and
shall remain in effect until December 31st of the year in which the levy
is repealed as provided by law
This Section
establishes the County's authority under the State statute to levy the sales
tax and sets up the taxable items according to Florida law. The amount of the sales tax is set at one (1)
percent with no provision for a gradual ramp up of the tax amount.
You will also
note that the use of the Tax is limited to the purpose set forth in the
Ordinance and is to remain in effect until December 31 in the year in which the
levy is repealed by law.
Note that any
bond issue where the sales tax is pledged as a bond revenue source would
prevent any repeal of the sales tax and there is no provision preventing
refinancing of any initial bond issue which could, without voter approval, keep
the sales tax in force literally forever.
Section 3. Administration, Collection and
Enforcement. The Florida Department of Revenue shall have all
responsibility for the administration, collection, and enforcement of the
Surtax levied pursuant to this Ordinance.
This Section establishes the Florida Department of
Revenue as the authority for administration, collection,
and enforcement of the Surtax levied pursuant to this Ordinance, but the County
will distribute the funds via a series of undefined interlocal agreements to
PSTA.
The County and PSTA are
currently frantically trying to formalize these interlocal agreements even
before the Referendum vote takes place.
Section 4. Distribution, Use and Financial
Management of Surtax Proceeds.
(a) The Surtax
shall be collected by the Department of Revenue and distributed monthly to the
County. The County shall deposit the proceeds into the Transportation System
Surtax Trust Fund, which fund is hereby created, to be held by the Pinellas
County Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller ("Clerk") solely
for the benefit and distribution in accordance with the terms of this Ordinance
and any inter local agreements providing for the distribution of Surtax
proceeds.
Note that there are NO terms of revenue distribution
in the Ordinance and there is no definition of the terms of the undefined
interlocal agreements. The funds may be held by the County but should they be
pledged as bond payments, the bond covenants will set the terms for
distribution. There is no specific funding identified for the Bus system
expansion.
(b) Subject
to the limitations imposed by applicable law, the Surtax proceeds shall be used
for the improvement, construction, operation, and maintenance of public transit
benefitting Pinellas County, including an expanded bus system with bus rapid
transit, increased frequency and extended hours, and local passenger rail and
regional connections, and for the payment of the principal and interest on
indebtedness (including refinancing thereof) or other financial obligations
which may be incurred for such transportation improvements, as authorized by
the Acts. The County is authorized to enter into interlocal agreements pursuant
to the Acts providing for the distribution of the proceeds from the Surtax
to be expended for the purposes authorized in this Ordinance.
In this Sub Section we get close to a commitment to
expanding bus service, with some detail: expanded
bus system with bus rapid transit, increased frequency and extended hours; but
no specifics related to the amount of funds, distribution or obligation of
funds to the bus expansion or timing of the bus system expansion. There also no
provision for preventing taking funds from the bus system to pay for cost
overruns on the rail project or future shortfalls in rail operating revenues.
Here PSTA begins laying the ground work for converting
the sales tax into a bond issue and sets the stage for an undefined interlocal
agreement providing for the distribution of the sales tax proceeds. No detail
as to what those agreements will cover, how they will be developed or who will
actually vote on or approve them.
The County and PSTA are now trying to define these
interlocal agreements before the Referendum somewhat like the cart before the
horse. Interlocal agreements with the other jurisdictions in the County remain
undefined.
Note the Ordinance (Law) that you are being asked to
approve provides not only for the payment of bond indebtedness, but also allows
the pledging of the sales tax revenue for refinancing the bonds, thereby
virtually assuring that this sales tax will never go away.
In this Sub Section the Ordinance REQUIRES
that all of the sales tax funds received be remitted to PSTA as provided for vaguely
in the proceeding Section and further lays the ground work for a bond issue
based on the Ordinance. This sub section essentially stops the County from
withholding funds from PSTA as a punitive measure should PSTA go out of
control. Note that there is no reporting or accounting provision applied via this
Ordinance on PSTA to account for any of the funds.
There is no provision for withholding funds
should the PSTA continue to receive Property tax Revenue.
(c) The
County shall enter into the Inter local Agreement with PST A for the
distribution and use of the proceeds of the Surtax as provided in subsection
4(b) herein. Any Surtax proceeds deposited in the Transportation System Surtax
Trust Fund shall be remitted to the PST A in accordance with the Interlocal
Agreement, and shall be used for the purposes authorized in subsection 4(b)
herein, including the payment of the principal and interest on bonds or
other obligations or indebtedness, or refinancing such bonds or other
obligations, issued or incurred for such transit improvements, as authorized by
the Acts and this Ordinance.
In this Sub Section the Ordinance REQUIRES
that all of the sales tax funds received be remitted to PSTA as provided for vaguely
in the proceeding section and further lays the ground work for a bond issue
based on the Ordinance. This sub section essentially stops the County from
withholding funds from PSTA as a punitive measure should PSTA go out of
control. Note that there is no reporting or accounting provision applied via
this Ordinance on PSTA to account for any of the funds.
There is no provision for withholding funds
should the PSTA continue to receive Property tax Revenue.
(d)
The issuance of all bonds or other obligations or indebtedness pledging the
Surtax proceeds shall be subject to the prior approval of the Board, as
provided in and pursuant to an interlocal agreement with the agency receiving
Surtax proceeds.
This Sub Section sets up the bonding
mechanism but carefully omits which Board will approve the Bonds leaving that
to be defined in the interlocal agreement.
This interlocal agreement will be
"worked out" between the PSTA Board and the County Commission, only
problem is there are several County Commission members on the PSTA Board along
with a host of other elected officials who may just benefit from the funds
and/or bonds being approved. See the PSTA Board at this link PSTA Board of Directors.
It's all
bit like putting the fox in charge of the hen house.
Section 5. Conduction of Referendum
Election. The Board hereby calls a referendum election and directs the
Pinellas County Supervisor of Elections to conduct such election in
conjunction with the General Election on November 4, 2014, for the
submission of a referendum question to the electors of Pinellas County to
determine whether a majority of electors voting in the election are in favor of
the levy of the Surtax on transactions occurring within Pinellas County as
provided by law. Reasonable costs associated with conducting said election
shall be paid by the County.
This Section
formally calls for the Referendum to approve the sales tax increase and
indicates the County will pay for the costs associated with the
referendum.
Section 6. Ballot Title and
Summary. (a) In accordance with the Acts, and Section
101.161, Florida Statutes, the following ballot title and summary are approved
for submission to the electors of Pinellas County, Florida, for approval or
rejection by a majority of the electors voting in the referendum election
scheduled for November 4, 2014. The official ballot shall be in substantially
the following form:
Title:
Levy of Countywide One Percent Sales Surtax to Fund Greenlight Pinellas
Plan for Public Transit.
Summary: Shall the improvement, construction,
operation, maintenance and financing of public transit benefitting Pinellas
County, including an expanded bus system with bus rapid transit, increased
frequency and extended hours, local passenger rail and regional connections be
funded by levying a one percent sales surtax from January 1, 2016 until
repealed, with the proceeds deposited in a dedicated trust fund?
___ YES, for the 1% sales surtax
___ NO, against the 1% sales surtax
This is the actual language you will see on
your ballot.
The Title of
this referendum contains the Words Greenlight
Pinellas Plan but there is no place in the actual Ordinance you are being
asked to approve that specifically assigns or dedicates any specific funds or
percentage of funds to the GreenLight plan. The Ballot language was carefully
crafted to support the preplanned marketing effort and to mislead voters.
This is the
only place these words (GreenLight Plan) appear in this Ballot Language and
they only appear one other place the Sales Tax Ordinance.
The objective
here is to attempt to tie all of that advertising and information you will be
getting in the mail, seeing on TV and reading on the back of PSTA buses supporting
this initiative to the ballot referendum.
You will note
that the official Ballot Language Summary does not contain the words Greenlight Pinellas or GreenLight Plan.
Section 7. Notice of Election. The
Clerk shall publish notice of the referendum in accordance with Section
100.342, Florida Statutes, on the following dates: October 1, 2014 and
October 15,2014.
This Section sets the formal Publication Notices that
will appear in the legal section of a local news paper, and be posted on public
bulletin boards.
Section 8. Notice to the Department of
Revenue and Department of State. Upon completion of the referendum
election called for in this Ordinance, the results of such election shall
be certified in accordance with Chapter 100 and Chapter 102, Florida Statutes,
to the Department of State. If it is determined upon certification of the
results that the majority of the electors of Pinellas County voting in the
referendum election are in favor of the levy of the Surtax, the Clerk
shall, within ten (1 0)
days of such certification, but in no event later than November 16, 2015,
submit a copy of this Ordinance and the certification of the election
results to the Florida Department of Revenue. The notice shall specify
that the Surtax will go into effect on January 1, 2016, and will be in
effect until repealed as provided by law, that a surtax of 1% will be
imposed and provide such other information as the Department of Revenue
requires by rule. The Clerk shall also provide the additional notice to the
Department of Revenue required pursuant to Section 212.054(7)(b), Florida
Statutes.
This Section
establishes the time frame, notice and actions of the State Clerk who will
notify the Department of Revenue and the Tax will go into effect January 1 2016.
Section 9. Severability. If any
section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or provision of this Ordinance
is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any Court of
competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not be construed to render the
remaining provisions of this Ordinance invalid or unconstitutional.
This Section is
extremely important in this Ordinance given its poor construction. Legal
challenges are almost a certainty. Any successful legal challenge to a specific
Section of the Ordinance does not affect the remaining Sections.
In other Words,
it would require a legal action challenging the entire Ordinance to cause a
full repeal if you vote to make this Ordinance a law; something that would be
lengthy, costly and unlikely to happen.
Section 10. Inclusion in the Pinellas County
Code. The provisions of this Ordinance shall be included and incorporated
in the Pinellas County Code, as an addition or amendment thereto, and
shall be appropriately renumbered to conform to the uniform numbering
system of the Pinellas County Code.
This Section
requires that should the Ordinance be approved by voters it will become part of
the Pinellas County Code. That means it has the full force of law, and requires
significant and often complicated legal action to change or modify it once
approved by the Voters.
This Ordinance
has been crafted by PSTA to be a broad as possible, with few controls, no
reporting requirements and undefined interlocal agreements.
While it
appears that the County may be in control, actually do to the overlapping of
County Board of Commissioners and the PSTA Board and the number of elected
officials whose jurisdictions could or will benefit from the way the sales tax
monies are spent and the lack of defined controls; the PSTA will actually be in
control.
PSTA will
control the money so PSTA Board members who are elected officials could be put
in a position of following PSTA suggestions if they want their jurisdictions to
be part of the plan.
Section 11. Filing of Ordinance; Effective
Date. In addition to the notices to the Department of Revenue as provided
herein, pursuant to Section 125.66, Florida Statutes, a certified copy of
this Ordinance shall be filed with the Department of State by the Clerk
within ten ( 10) days after the enactment by the Board. This Ordinance
shall become effective upon filing of the Ordinance with the Department of
State.
This Section requires
filing of the Ordinance within ten days of enactment by the board, although
there is no clear indication of what provisions must be in place for the Board
to approve.
Epilog
It is difficult to truly
determine if this Ordinance is just poorly written or cleverly crafted to mislead
the voters.
Even the most casual
reader should begin to see that Ordinance 13- 34, The Sales Tax Referendum, is
not about public transportation it is about establishing a large stream of
unmanaged tax revenue to an Authority,(PSTA), that is controlled by politicians
not directly elected for that purpose and strongly influenced by special
interests who stand to benefit significantly from the revenue flow.
This Referendum is not
about public transportation, it is all about turning PSTA into the most
powerful, publicly funded redevelopment agency ever created in Pinellas County.
Along with its powerful
supporters: National, State and Local Association of Realtors, leading
financial organizations, Chamber of Commerce, electric Utilities and other
major players, all of whom stand to benefit greatly, will be a deep pockets
force determined to get their way for decades to come in Pinellas County.
Thank you for taking the
time to read through this lengthy Ordinance and my analysis. Please feel free
to copy and reproduce this document, link to it and forward it to your friends
on social media and via e-mail.
E-mail
Doc at: dr.webb@verizon.net. Or
send me a Facebook (Gene Webb) Friend request. Please comment below, and be
sure to share on Facebook and Twitter.
Disclosures: Contributor to No Tax for Tracks.
Disclosures: Contributor to No Tax for Tracks.
No comments:
Post a Comment