I could hardly believe my eyes last week when during Don
Ewing's Greenlight Yes presentation at the North Pinellas County Regional
Chamber of Commerce Forum when a slide popped up listing the three objectives
of the Greenlight effort and one of them was REDEVELOPMENT.
While I had heard redevelopment mentioned, hinted at and even
chuckled about; I had never seen it in a formal Greenlight presentation as one
of the three primary objectives of the Greenlight light rail effort.
It was especially
interesting as Ewing went on to point out that residential, commercial
real-estate, business and commerce will all migrate toward the rail centers,
given the fact that his audience lives, works and for the most part has no
business interests anywhere near the proposed meandering light rail line.
Ewing went on to expand on how business will change as the
community redevelops around the Greenlight plan. You could see the concern on
the faces in the room.
Now you understand why the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION of Realtors
kicked in $245,000 to support Green Light Yes, check my Post 245,000
Reasons to Vote NO on Green Light Pinellas.
Greenlight Pinellas went astray as it came into the clutches
of TBARTA, and the big Real-estate developers.
It morphed from its original purpose, which was to provide public
transportation for those who really need it, into a masterfully crafted redevelopment
plan designed to funnel 100s of millions of tax
payer dollars into what people
think is a transportation authority but what will ultimately become the biggest
redevelopment agency in the County and mostly outside the control of the County
Commission and the local municipalities.
How could that paragraph above be true?
Simple.
Take a look at my Post Greenlight
Pinellas Surtax Interlocal Agreements. Note what is not covered in the
Milestones: BONDING, the issuing of obligation bonds, essentially loans, to
finance the light rail redevelopment plan.
One way to craft the light rail program and its
redevelopment objectives is through a series of carefully constructed
obligation bond issues with highly restrictive bond covenants detailing how the
money must be spent.
Once issued, the money (sales tax revenue) pledged to these
bonds is no longer available and cannot be reduced, and the covenants within
the bonds are essentially unchangeable and outside the purview of any political
body.
With permission in both the Ordinance No 13 34, voters are
being asked to approve, and the PSTA/County Interlocal Agreement to renew these
bonds over and over, both light rail and the redevelopment of Pinellas County
become a self fulfilling prophecy.
Not possible you say.
Then why are organizations like the National Association of Realtors, major financial institutions,
builders and lawyers lining up and opening their wallets in such a big way to
support this tax referendum?
I would offer it is much more opportunistic than altruistic.
e-mail Doc at: dr.webb@verizon.net, or send me a Facebook (Gene Webb)Friend
request. See More of Doc at Bay Post Internet and St.Pete Patch, Gulfport Patch, Clearwater
Patch, Palm
Harbor Patch, Largo
Patch.
Disclosures: Contributor to No Tax for Tracks
Disclosures: Contributor to No Tax for Tracks
No comments:
Post a Comment