The way I see it the five members of the St. Pete Pier Selection
Committee, Kai Warren, Gary Mitchum,
Melanie Lenz, James Jackson Jr. and Michael G. Meidel are in a tough spot.
Part of their dilemma is of their own making. Had they just
ranked their three selections, regardless of the ranking, the spotlight would
now be on City Council. Instead, as they did in the meeting where they could
eliminate proposers, where they whiffed on the job and let way too many pass
through to the next phase; they could not come to a decision at ranking time.
Now they are faced with a Mayor who wants to "build the damn
Pier," a Chairman who figuratively jumped off the exiting Pier with his
anti pyramid rant and the firestorm they
created by at least hinting they are leaning toward ranking ALMA first the
least popular design among the public.
There are a host of problems.
Some if not all of these Committee members may have to deal with
the Chairman on future City projects or requests. As one who personally knows
the Chairman, Mike Connors, has a long memory. Some Committee members may be
looking past the Pier to the future.
The Mayor has, so far, stood behind the Connors' comments and he may
be sending a message to the Committee or he may not, but it is clear the Mayor
would not be disappointed to see the inverted Pyramid go. So do you buck the Mayor?
Same problem as above.
Although the volume has died down a bit, a significant portion of
those focused on the Pier are ready to pounce if the Committee's decision seems
way off base to them.
The Committee, which seemed to be a bit hamstrung by the
selection process, may be receiving some ease with comments from the Public
and to some small degree the City Legal department. It will be interesting to
watch the Chairman if the Committee begins to take a more liberal
interpretation of the selection/ranking process, and what if any questions the
Committee may have for the Legal department.
All in all a tough spot for five people who I believe genuinely
wanted to be part of the Pier selection process.
This time around they need to have a short discussion; the less
said the better, rank three and adjourn the meeting. A long winded rehash of
the designs and any "new" information presented by the proposers or
staff is a waste of time. It will just be fodder for what is likely to
follow.
E-mail Doc at mail
to:dr.gwebb@yahoo.com or send me
a Facebook (Gene Webb) Friend request. Please comment below, and be sure to
share on Facebook. See Doc's Photo Gallery at Bay
Post Photos
No comments:
Post a Comment