Tampa,
Fl
From: Tampa Bay Guardian
Edited by: Tom Rask
From: Tampa Bay Guardian
Edited by: Tom Rask
Posted by TBG2016 on FEBRUARY
15, 2020
At
PSTA’s Legislative Committee meeting on February 5th, PSTA’s federal lobbyist
Harry Glenn spoke of a list that the FTA has. “It’s actually a list
of projects…that kind of gives the Congress an expectation of what projects
they [the FTA] expects to get funded in the next year,” Glenn said.
The
FTA is the Federal Transit Administration. Glenn was responding to a question
from Pinellas County comissioner Charlie Justice (full exchange here) about how
so-called “Small Starts” projects like the Central Avenue BRT (CABRT) project
are administered by the FTA.
Harry Glenn |
Yet
the CABRT project has now been on that “funded in the next year” list Glenn
spoke of for three years without receiving a so-called construction grant
agreement (CGA). Obtaining a CGA is the first and necessary step before being
recommended for funding by the FTA.
And
with yesterday afternoon’s release of the FTA’s “Annual Report on Funding
Recommendations” for fiscal year 2021, it appears that this
“funded in the next year” period Glenn spoke of will be at least four (4) years
for the CABRT.
“Remember,
this is the president’s request for funding, and Congress has appropriated more
than that amount in the last couple of years,” Glenn told The Guardian. “PSTA
is doing exactly what they should be doing.”
The
Guardian previously reported on
PSTA’s failure to secure a CGA last year as well, and the PSTA board’s
unwillingness to acknowledge this fact at their meetings.
“This
is not a competitively awarded program, where you will win and somebody else will
lose,” Glenn said at that same
February 5th meeting. ” You work through the process and as you check off the
boxes, funding will become available to you.”
Glenn’s
claim that the program is “not competitively awarded program” conflicts with
PSTA CEO Brad Miller’s statement in
that same meeting in which he called these projects “very, very competitive.”
The
funds are awarded under the so-called 5309 program, which the FTA says is a
discretionary program. That means there is no guarantee that a particular
program will be funded, or that a program that receives a CGA will be funded.
Karen Jaroch |
“It’s
definitely a setback for PSTA that they still haven’t received a CGA,” former
HART (Hillsborough Area Regional Transit) board member Karen Jaroch said.
Jaroch
said that the CABRT project is one of many projects totaling approximately $1.6
billion competing for a pot of money less than half that size. Jaroch continued
– “The FTA awards project funding only when PSTA can assure them that the
project scope and costs are firm and reliable, that all local funding
commitments are in place, and that all localities in the corridor are
on-board.”
“Significant
issues have been raised by PSTA’s grant submission, such as falsely claiming
that St Pete Beach was a funding partner in the original application, the
formal objection to the project by two of the three cities impacted by the
project’s auto lane elimination and changing route endpoints. These facts don’t
inspire sufficient confidence in the project, “Jaroch added. “Overcoming these
facts will be difficult when compounded by PSTA’s past track record of abusing
a federal grant meant for transit security and St. Pete Mayor Rick Kriseman’s
unwelcoming comments about President Trump.”
ABOVE – Kriseman’s 2015 tweet |
Jaroch
was referring to Kriseman’s 2015 tweet (seen left) in which he barred
Donald Trump from entering the City of St. Petersburg. Most of the proposed
CABRT will run within that city’s limits.
Obtaining
a CGA doesn’t insure FTA funding. Some projects that obtained a CGA were never
funded, and others , such as the Fort Lauderdale WAVE Streetcar, were cancelled by the City of Fort
Lauderdale even after it obtained a CGA.
With
such spectacular and recent PR disasters, the FTA is likely to look even closer
at what projects it funds. The FTA is sure to want to avoid another “St. Louis
Situation” at all costs.
“My
understanding is that this is just a snapshot of where they are now,” Harry
Glenn said, referring to the just published annual funding recommendations from
the FTA. “There are additional funds available that can be allocated. When that
will happen, I don’t know.”
Will
the CABRT project ever be built? Or is it a project that is always a
bridesmaid, but never a bride, at the wedding and spreading of federal funding?
As
always….the
Guardian reports and our readers decide. Like our Facebook page to find
out when we publish articles.
This post is contributed by the Tampa Bay Guardian. The views expressed
in this post are the author's and do not necessarily reflect those of the
publisher of Bay Post Internet or any publications, blogs or social media pages
where it may appear.
Cross
Posted with permission from: Tampa
Bay Guardian
No comments:
Post a Comment